Suddenly I’m at an imaginary party.
“Nice party,†I say to a passing poet, rather lamely. She nods politely. I look around, a bit lost.
“Listen,†I say, “do you know why I’m here?â€
“I don’t even know why I’m here,†she says crankily. “Why am I a poet? You’re making me up, you tell me.â€
We look awkwardly into our punch glasses while I guiltily try to work out what kind of character she should be. I decide that she has just seen the film Moulin Rouge, and have her suddenly demand of me whether, like famous artists Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec and Ewan MacGregor, I am passionately devoted to Truth, Beauty and Above All Love.
I quickly nip off to the kitchen to refill my glass.
Hiding casually under a kitchen table, I consider her question and my response which, staring up at the passing knees, I can’t defend against a charge of panic. It was a fair, if slightly florid, question to ask a writer, and the kind of thing about which a writer might reasonably be expected to hold strong opinions. I run through mine.
I’m all for Love. Couldn’t fault it. And if you’re after something to put Above All, Love’s the very chap. No problem there.
And if you’re willing to accept the various crystalline glories of Georgian folk harmonies, my six-year old niece and the career pitchmap of Glenn McGrath, I’ve got Beauty knocked into a cocked hat.
I imagine some chewing gum stuck to the underside of the table and frown at it. It was Truth, then. Why?
I write fiction, which means that although much of The Last Monk, for example, is based on real things and places, it is almost completely made up. None of the people exist and none of the events ever happened. It’s fiction, and I work damn hard to make it stranger than truth.
Yet I’d like to think that when I write I am trying to find out the truth about things: about the baffling ways people act, how the world works and, in my case, the way it feels to talk to dust bunnies or start a civil war in a marching band.
So my book is simultaneously true and false, real and made-up. How?
The poet’s Doc Martens swish by the table on the way to the door, apparently fed up with being called into existence then abandoned in the lounge room. I poke my head out from under the table.
There is a theory of quantum mechanics which states that, until observed, a sub-atomic particle may be in two different states, even two different places, at the same time, and that this is nothing to worry about, even though it sounds like it should be. Think of Schrödinger’s Cat, simultaneously alive and dead in a box until someone opens the lid. Perhaps there is a way for something to be both true and fictional, at least until someone reads it and decides in their own framework of reference which it is. In these circumstances, I realise, I can stop worrying about verisimilitude and just go for it.
A giant monkey-lobster creature in harlequin tights enters the kitchen in a dune buggy at that moment and asks me what I am doing under there. I say I am hiding in a fictional party in order to contemplate Truth, Beauty and Above All Quantum Superposition.
He says great and could I pass him a Bacardi Breezer.
Truth, Beauty and Above All Quantum Superposition
Suddenly I’m at an imaginary party.
“Nice party,†I say to a passing poet, rather lamely. She nods politely. I look around, a bit lost.
“Listen,†I say, “do you know why I’m here?â€
“I don’t even know why I’m here,†she says crankily. “Why am I a poet? You’re making me up, you tell me.â€
We look awkwardly into our punch glasses while I guiltily try to work out what kind of character she should be. I decide that she has just seen the film Moulin Rouge, and have her suddenly demand of me whether, like famous artists Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec and Ewan MacGregor, I am passionately devoted to Truth, Beauty and Above All Love.
I quickly nip off to the kitchen to refill my glass.
Hiding casually under a kitchen table, I consider her question and my response which, staring up at the passing knees, I can’t defend against a charge of panic. It was a fair, if slightly florid, question to ask a writer, and the kind of thing about which a writer might reasonably be expected to hold strong opinions. I run through mine.
I’m all for Love. Couldn’t fault it. And if you’re after something to put Above All, Love’s the very chap. No problem there.
And if you’re willing to accept the various crystalline glories of Georgian folk harmonies, my six-year old niece and the career pitchmap of Glenn McGrath, I’ve got Beauty knocked into a cocked hat.
I imagine some chewing gum stuck to the underside of the table and frown at it. It was Truth, then. Why?
I write fiction, which means that although much of The Last Monk, for example, is based on real things and places, it is almost completely made up. None of the people exist and none of the events ever happened. It’s fiction, and I work damn hard to make it stranger than truth.
Yet I’d like to think that when I write I am trying to find out the truth about things: about the baffling ways people act, how the world works and, in my case, the way it feels to talk to dust bunnies or start a civil war in a marching band.
So my book is simultaneously true and false, real and made-up. How?
The poet’s Doc Martens swish by the table on the way to the door, apparently fed up with being called into existence then abandoned in the lounge room. I poke my head out from under the table.
There is a theory of quantum mechanics which states that, until observed, a sub-atomic particle may be in two different states, even two different places, at the same time, and that this is nothing to worry about, even though it sounds like it should be. Think of Schrödinger’s Cat, simultaneously alive and dead in a box until someone opens the lid. Perhaps there is a way for something to be both true and fictional, at least until someone reads it and decides in their own framework of reference which it is. In these circumstances, I realise, I can stop worrying about verisimilitude and just go for it.
A giant monkey-lobster creature in harlequin tights enters the kitchen in a dune buggy at that moment and asks me what I am doing under there. I say I am hiding in a fictional party in order to contemplate Truth, Beauty and Above All Quantum Superposition.
He says great and could I pass him a Bacardi Breezer.