Tempt­ing hats, kinky chairs and reverse-somersaulting climaxes

Word­count = 86,150

I’ve spent much of the last three weeks inform­ing the reader (also the spouse, the neigh­bour and the teen-aged sales assist­ant at J.B. HiFi) of my rev­el­a­tion that before I could type a single word of the grand cli­max of The Last Monk, time would be required to per­col­ate, to mull, and gen­er­ally to walk around parks scowl­ing at ducks in the vain hope that someone would ask me what I was look­ing so thought­ful about.

Quite a bit of time, I thought. About a fortnight. 

As it hap­pens, it took about six hours.

The best per­col­at­ing is done out­side the house. In fact, for the abso­lutely optimum res­ult, it is neces­sary to travel as far from the com­puter, the teapot and the hat col­lec­tion as pos­sible [hat col­lec­tions are, it is safe to say, trouble for a writer dying for a new idea at a quarter to four in the after­noon, when the chapter is two pages short and all tea has been drunk and all the sand­wiches made and damn it that deer­stalker is just lying over there and no one’s try­ing it on…].

I chose the State Lib­rary. The La Trobe Read­ing Room at the heart of the SLV is an impos­ing, ser­i­ous place: a four-storey, domed cav­ern lined with niches and inac­cess­ible ledges, its desks are arranged in long, axial lines like spokes in a great wheel.

I would say that it is awe­somely silent, which is what it should be, but the stew­ards of the La Trobe care­fully main­tain a long-held and, for lib­rar­i­ans, deeply kinky tra­di­tion, which is the chairs.

The heavy, uncush­ioned wooden chairs in the La Trobe Read­ing Room are seem­ingly ori­ginal fit­tings, and are extraordin­ary for two reas­ons. The first is their volume: they are, without a doubt, the loudest chairs any­where in the bib­li­o­philic world. Each one emits a blood-curdling metal­lic shriek at reg­u­lar inter­vals, whether or not the per­son sit­ting on it has actu­ally moved.

This is caused by the ancient set of springs arrayed around the single, cent­ral leg sup­port­ing the seat, and this in turn leads to the second extraordin­ary thing about the seats: it is abso­lutely impossible to lean back in one without exit­ing it. The springs some­how pre­vent the seat from fall­ing for­ward, or to either side, but as soon as the centre of grav­ity of the occu­pant shifts aft of the leg, the whole con­trap­tion tips back­ward viol­ently, per­haps to afford a bet­ter view of the newly-renovated ceiling.

Whatever the reason, the upshot is that if, after a pro­trac­ted period of study bent over some ancient and eso­teric book of lore, you sud­denly come to some pro­foundly mov­ing rev­el­a­tion about the essen­tial one­ness of all being and the trans­it­ory nature of human thought in an infin­ite uni­verse, you may sit back to take in this utterly unique moment, unex­pec­tedly per­form a reverse somer­sault and spread your­self across the carpet.

I chose my seat with care and spread out the tools required: my note­book, some multi-coloured sys­tem cards, a pen and scis­sors. I cut the sys­tem cards into small strips and on each one wrote a single plot point or import­ant event which needs to take place in the cli­max. One col­our for each plot­line, one card for each event. In two hours I had a couple of dozen cards spread across the desk, in no par­tic­u­lar order, each card culled from five years’ worth of notes or spon­tan­eous inspiration.

Once all the pieces of the puzzle are laid out, it’s a mat­ter of build­ing the pic­ture, just like a jig­saw, although obvi­ously I’d prefer it didn’t turn out to be a pic­ture of the Eif­fel Tower or kit­tens play­ing with balls of wool.

In what order should things hap­pen? Who tells the story? What’s import­ant, what’s abso­lutely vital, and what can be left in the back­ground? How fast should it hap­pen? When does the reader learn the import­ant inform­a­tion, and from whom?

It is, in fact, a reverse jig­saw: you start with the pieces, each of which has a shape and some detail, and then you decide what kind of pic­ture you want to make with them. Along the way, you throw out some pieces and write new ones, because you’ve real­ised you can make a much bet­ter pic­ture that way.

It took about four hours. I ended up with sev­en­teen sys­tem cards in two col­ours, arranged in plot order. It looked very much like this:

It was the cli­max of my book, in point form. I can see the end now. It looks good.

I smiled, leaned back, unex­pec­tedly per­formed a reverse somer­sault and went home.

There is now only one more step required before I can begin typ­ing out the last pages of my novel. That step is, of course, this:

This entry was posted in LaTrobe Reading Room, editing, photos, writing. Bookmark the permalink. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

7 Comments

  1. Posted June 19, 2005 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Seems like you’re form­ing a pretty close bond with that pussy!

  2. jelena
    Posted June 20, 2005 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    well, i have been wait­ing to be re-connected to the inter­net at work in order to add a com­ment to your (abso­lutely bril­liant!) site! i love the pic­tures that tell a thou­sand words, too. maybe you should also think about pub­lish­ing (in a print form) the ‘the thrill and the agon­ies of a new writer, aged … — insert — and a …’? :) and, of course, good luck — i am really look­ing for­ward to see­ing the fin­ished book on the shelves!

  3. Jenni
    Posted June 20, 2005 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Does the edit­or­ial con­sult­ant look dis­pleased because of the plot-card sequence or is he still sore about the new office arrangement???

  4. Jenni
    Posted June 20, 2005 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Does the edit­or­ial con­sult­ant look stern because of the plot-card sequence or is he still sore about the new office arrangement???

  5. Jenni
    Posted June 20, 2005 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Oops, I changed my mind about the ed’s expres­sion halfway through send­ing & stopped to change the post, think­ing no-one would ever know…apparently it sent both any­way! Oh well, you get more mes­sages this way!

  6. mat
    Posted June 22, 2005 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Jenni for ably boost­ing my com­ment statistics. 

    Without want­ing to threaten writer-consultant con­fid­en­ti­al­ity, I can tell you that the con­sult­ant was hard but fair, passing my nar­rat­ive struc­ture at only the third draft.

    He then took one of the cards and bur­ied it in his edit­or­ial consultant-litter, so I’m afraid we’ll never find out if Jack makes it to that all-important final piano les­son I’ve been build­ing up since page 20.

    He also likes his new office, spend­ing as much as five minutes of every day in it.

  7. mat
    Posted June 22, 2005 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Thanks also Jelena. I can reveal that my edit­or­ial con­sult­ant is work­ing on an extra­vag­ant, large-format cof­fee table book, mostly con­sist­ing of drooled-on pages from The Last Monk and gra­tu­it­ous nud­ity. Keep an eye out at Christmas.

One Trackback

  1. […] I have returned to the LaTrobe after nearly eight­een months as a res­ult of a dis­cus­sion with my friend Oscar. He believes that I will start writ­ing again after sev­eral months of writer’s block if I start apply­ing some rigid struc­tures to my work­ing life: to become what he calls a scaffoldist. […]